Theo Laurent AI tutor portrait for this course

Guided course - 5 chapters

Chord progressions: A Practical Course with Theo Laurent

Theo Laurent teaches Chord progressions through five practical chapters that move from a clear foundation to guided work, applied decisions, and revision. You will finish with a finished draft with process notes, a tutor-ready capstone, saved notes, and a repeatable way to continue practicing.

Curious beginners to advanced hobbyists 2 hrs 30 min Practice and checkpoints Free curriculum
Start or resume

Your course progress

0 of 5 chapters complete

0%
0%

Sign in is required to save progress, checkpoint answers, and notes. Sign in to continue.

Next: chapter 1

What you will learn

Build knowledge, use it, and leave with evidence of progress.

  • Explain the essential Chord progressions vocabulary through a connected mental model.
  • Follow and explain a reliable creative practice workflow in guided practice.
  • Apply Chord progressions to a realistic scenario with visible constraints and tradeoffs.
  • Evaluate and revise a finished draft with process notes using evidence-based success criteria.
  • Complete a capstone and leave with a specific next-practice plan.

Before you start

  • No portfolio is required
  • Use the tools and materials you already have where possible

Useful materials

  • A notebook or sketchbook
  • Relevant basic creative tools
  • A way to photograph, record, or export work for review

Suggested rhythm

Complete one 30-minute chapter at a time: learn for 10 minutes, practice for 15, then use 5 minutes for the checkpoint and notes.

Course capstone

Chord progressions showcase piece

Respond to a focused Chord progressions brief and document the path from reference and rough draft to a revised final piece.

What you will submit

  1. A one-paragraph creative brief
  2. At least two exploratory drafts
  3. A finished piece with a revision reflection

How it will be reviewed

  • The intent is recognizable
  • Craft choices support the brief
  • Development is documented
  • Revision improves a named weakness

Course chapters

Learn, practice, check, and record what matters.

2 hrs 30 min total
  1. Chapter 1

    Chord progressions: Foundations and vocabulary

    Build a dependable mental model for Chord progressions before trying to memorize isolated details. You will define the essential vocabulary, inspect a worked example, and turn the ideas into a reference you can actually use.

    27 min Not complete

    Learning objectives

    • Explain the purpose of Chord progressions in your own words.
    • Use the chapter vocabulary accurately in a short example.
    • Distinguish a strong example from a common misconception.
    • Create a compact reference for later practice.

    Key terms

    1

    Start with the purpose

    Place Chord progressions inside a small creative brief with a clear audience, mood, or purpose. Name the result a learner is trying to produce and the constraints that make the skill useful.

    2

    How Chord progressions actually works

    These are the load-bearing ideas. Everything later in the course is an application of one of them, so it is worth reading slowly and returning to when something stops making sense.

    • Triads are stacked thirds counted in semitones. A major triad is the root plus four semitones plus seven, so C major is C, E, G. A minor triad lowers only the middle note to three semitones, so C minor is C, E flat, G.
    • Sevenths are named by the interval above the root. A dominant seventh adds ten semitones above the root, making G7 into G, B, D, F, while a major seventh adds eleven, making G major seventh into G, B, D, F sharp. That single semitone is the difference between a chord that pulls to C and one that sits still.
    • Diatonic chords follow a fixed quality pattern. Every major key produces the same qualities in order: major, minor, minor, major, major, minor, diminished. In C that gives C, Dm, Em, F, G, Am and B diminished, which is why the I-V-vi-IV progression in C is C, G, Am, F.
    3

    Misconceptions worth clearing early

    Each of these is common, understandable, and expensive to leave in place. Recognising them now saves rework later.

    • Treating C7 and C major seventh as the same chord. The symbols look similar, so the two get used interchangeably as if they were voicings of one chord. Fix: C7 contains B flat while C major seventh contains B; play them back to back and the harmonic function changes, not only the colour.
    • Learning shapes without learning the notes. Guitar and keyboard shapes work immediately, so the intervals underneath never get learned. Fix: Name the three notes aloud every time you play a triad, and within a few weeks transposing stops requiring a chart.
    • Editing while generating. Judgement feels like quality control. Fix: Separate the sessions: make first without evaluating, then critique in a distinct pass.
    4

    Build the mental model

    Connect the key terms as a process rather than a word list. Use this sequence: collect references, make a rough draft, develop one choice, and revise with focused critique.

    5

    Catch the common miss

    Compare a surface-level attempt with one that shows intentional choices, craft control, a coherent result, and thoughtful revision. Explain the single difference that matters most.

    CHAPTER 1 OF 5 · FOUNDATIONSChord progressionsLeaves you with a finished draft with process notesCOURSE PROGRESSbriefreferencecompositionKEY TERMS
    Equation in context

    Equal temperament

    f_n = f_0 \cdot 2^{n/12}

    Every semitone multiplies frequency by the same ratio, so the same chord shape works in every key.

    Chord lab

    Build a chord and hear why it works

    Pick a root and a quality. The keyboard lights the formula in semitones, and Play lets your ears verify it.

    A chord is a recipe measured in semitones. The same shape slid anywhere along the keyboard keeps its character — that is why progressions transpose.

    • Build C major, then A minor — they share two notes. Find them.
    • Play major and minor on the same root and put the difference into words.
    • Move one quality up semitone by semitone and listen to what stays the same.
    Side-by-side comparison

    Two drafts of the same piece

    Both attempts look plausible from a distance. Toggle the highlights and study where they part ways.

    Aspect First-idea draft Developed draft
    Intent The mood drifts halfway through One clear intention carried start to finish
    Craft Every effect applied at once One technique controlled, in service of the brief
    Revision Restarted from scratch after vague dissatisfaction One named weakness fixed, with before and after kept

    The developed draft is not more talented — it is more decided.

    Practice round

    Match the Chord progressions vocabulary

    Tap a term, then the definition it belongs to. Wrong guesses cost nothing but honesty.

    Retrieval beats rereading: pulling a definition from memory strengthens it far more than recognizing it on the page.

    • Clear the board once, shuffle, and beat your attempt count.
    • Say each definition aloud before tapping — then check yourself.
    Practice activity - 12 min

    Make a one-page field guide

    Create a compact field guide that would help a new learner recognize and begin using Chord progressions.

    1. Write a one-sentence definition and purpose.
    2. Add the four key terms with a plain-language example.
    3. Include one non-example and explain why it misses.
    4. Finish with a three-step starter checklist.
    Deliverable

    One annotated page or slide that can be reused in later chapters.

    Success looks like
    • The definition is specific.
    • Examples match the vocabulary.
    • The checklist is usable without extra explanation.
    Knowledge check

    Which response best shows a usable foundation in Chord progressions?

    1 question
    Which response best shows a usable foundation in Chord progressions?
    Not started

    Sign in to save chapter notes to your account.

    Ready to complete this chapter? Complete the field guide and answer the checkpoint before moving to guided practice.
  2. Chapter 2

    Song structure: Guided demonstration

    Follow a complete Song structure example from setup to result, pausing at the decisions that experts often make silently. Then repeat the process with support and check your work against visible criteria.

    29 min Not complete

    Learning objectives

    • Sequence the main steps in a reliable Song structure workflow.
    • Explain why each important decision is made.
    • Complete a supported example without skipping verification.
    • Use a checklist to identify one correction.

    Key terms

    1

    Watch the whole process

    Trace a model from the initial prompt to a finished draft with process notes. Mark each point where the learner must observe, choose, or verify rather than act automatically.

    2

    Worked example: Mapping a standard verse-chorus arrangement

    Follow each step and predict the next before you read it. Predicting first is what turns a demonstration into practice.

    1. Verse 1 sets the situation over a sparse arrangement, typically eight or sixteen bars.
    2. The pre-chorus lifts the melody and thins the instrumentation for four bars to create expectation.
    3. The chorus arrives with the title line, the fullest arrangement and the highest melody notes of the song.
    4. The bridge follows the second chorus with new harmony or a shifted viewpoint, then the final chorus returns with one element added, such as a doubled vocal.

    Arrangement, not only chords, is what tells a listener which section they are currently in.

    3

    Where this usually goes wrong

    Watch for these while you work through the demonstration rather than afterwards.

    • Verse and chorus sitting in the same register. Writers compose in a comfortable range, so the chorus lands where the verse did and stops feeling like an arrival. Fix: Move the chorus melody up by a third or more, or lower the verse, so the contrast registers before the words do.
    • A bridge that is just another verse. Bridges are usually written last and tend to reuse the verse chords with fresh lyrics. Fix: Change something structural: begin on a different chord, alter the harmonic rhythm, or move to the relative minor.
    • Editing while generating. Judgement feels like quality control. Fix: Separate the sessions: make first without evaluating, then critique in a distinct pass.
    4

    Practice with scaffolding

    Repeat the model with one detail changed. Keep the prompts visible and say or write the reason for each choice before continuing.

    5

    Check before feedback

    Use intentional choices, craft control, a coherent result, and thoughtful revision as the quality test. Make one self-correction before asking the tutor to review the result.

    CHAPTER 2 OF 5 · GUIDED DEMOSong structureLeaves you with a finished draft with process notesCOURSE PROGRESSreferencecompositiondraftKEY TERMS
    Arrangement lab

    Lay a song on the clock

    Set the tempo and section lengths; the timeline shows when every section actually arrives.

    Structure is arithmetic before it is art: bars times beats times tempo decides whether the chorus lands at 40 seconds or 90 — and listeners feel the difference.

    • Get the first chorus to arrive before 45 seconds.
    • Double the tempo and watch what happens to the total length.
    Guided flowchart

    A complete Song structure practice run

    Pause at each arrow and explain the decision before moving to the next step.

    Step 1 of 4: Read the task
    Practice round

    Rebuild the Song structure method

    The steps of this chapter's method, shuffled. Arrange them so they would actually work.

    A method is a sequence, not a bag of tips — if the order surprises you, that is exactly the gap worth closing now.

    • Order the steps, then explain to yourself why step 2 cannot go last.
    • Shuffle again and solve it in fewer moves.
    Practice activity - 15 min

    Complete the guided run

    Use the chapter workflow to produce a finished draft with process notes for a slightly changed Song structure example.

    1. Restate the task and constraints.
    2. Follow the model one decision at a time.
    3. Record the reason for two key choices.
    4. Check the result and revise one issue.
    Deliverable

    A completed guided example with two decision notes and one correction.

    Success looks like
    • The workflow is complete.
    • Decisions have reasons.
    • The final check produces a visible correction.
    Knowledge check

    During guided Song structure practice, when is the best time to explain a choice?

    1 question
    During guided Song structure practice, when is the best time to explain a choice?
    Not started

    Sign in to save chapter notes to your account.

    Ready to complete this chapter? Submit the guided example with decision notes, one self-correction, and the checkpoint response.
  3. Chapter 3

    Lyric revision: Applied scenario

    Transfer Lyric revision into a realistic scenario where the prompt is less tidy and more than one option may be reasonable. You will define the constraints, choose an approach, and defend the tradeoff.

    32 min Not complete

    Learning objectives

    • Extract the relevant facts and constraints from a realistic scenario.
    • Generate at least two plausible approaches to Lyric revision.
    • Choose an approach using explicit criteria.
    • Explain the likely consequence of the choice.

    Key terms

    1

    Read the situation

    Translate the scenario into a clear task. Separate facts, assumptions, constraints, and information that is interesting but not relevant to Lyric revision.

    2

    Choosing well under real constraints

    Applied work is mostly judgement under limits: less time, less information, and more competing goals than a textbook example allows. These are the decision rules that hold up in practice.

    • You feel stuck mid-piece: Reduce the scope rather than abandoning it; a finished small version teaches more than an abandoned large one.
    • Feedback conflicts: Weight it by whether the person is your intended audience, and look for the note repeated by several people.
    • A piece is nearly done but not exciting: Ask what single element you would defend, and strengthen that instead of smoothing everything.
    3

    Reading the situation before acting

    Before choosing an approach, state three things explicitly: what result the situation actually requires, which constraints are fixed rather than preferences, and what evidence would tell you the approach is working. Skipping this step is the most common reason competent work solves the wrong problem.

    • Triads are stacked thirds counted in semitones. A major triad is the root plus four semitones plus seven, so C major is C, E, G. A minor triad lowers only the middle note to three semitones, so C minor is C, E flat, G.
    4

    Practitioner notes

    Small pieces of working knowledge that rarely appear in introductory material.

    • Practise the changes rather than the chords. The gap between two shapes is where the time is lost, so drill the transition alone against a metronome.
    • Learn the inversions of every triad early. Moving to the nearest inversion instead of the root position is most of what makes accompaniment sound smooth.
    5

    Compare real options

    Generate two workable approaches and test both against the purpose. Do not hide the tradeoff; name what each option improves and what it gives up.

    6

    Make the reasoning visible

    Produce a finished draft with process notes and attach a short decision note. The note should make the result auditable, not merely confident.

    CHAPTER 3 OF 5 · APPLIED SCENARIOLyric revisionLeaves you with a finished draft with process notesCOURSE PROGRESScompositiondraftrevisionKEY TERMS
    Chord lab

    Build a chord and hear why it works

    Pick a root and a quality. The keyboard lights the formula in semitones, and Play lets your ears verify it.

    A chord is a recipe measured in semitones. The same shape slid anywhere along the keyboard keeps its character — that is why progressions transpose.

    • Build C major, then A minor — they share two notes. Find them.
    • Play major and minor on the same root and put the difference into words.
    • Move one quality up semitone by semitone and listen to what stays the same.
    Practice round

    Match the Lyric revision vocabulary

    Tap a term, then the definition it belongs to. Wrong guesses cost nothing but honesty.

    Retrieval beats rereading: pulling a definition from memory strengthens it far more than recognizing it on the page.

    • Clear the board once, shuffle, and beat your attempt count.
    • Say each definition aloud before tapping — then check yourself.
    Practice activity - 18 min

    Solve the scenario

    Apply Lyric revision to a scenario from school, work, home, or community life that includes at least two constraints.

    1. Write the task, audience, and constraints.
    2. Sketch two possible approaches.
    3. Choose using three criteria from the chapter.
    4. Produce the result and explain one tradeoff.
    Deliverable

    A scenario response with an option comparison and a short decision note.

    Success looks like
    • Constraints are visible.
    • Both options are plausible.
    • The final choice follows the stated criteria.
    Knowledge check

    What makes an applied Lyric revision decision defensible?

    1 question
    What makes an applied Lyric revision decision defensible?
    Not started

    Sign in to save chapter notes to your account.

    Ready to complete this chapter? Finish the scenario response, compare two options, and explain the selected tradeoff.
  4. Chapter 4

    Short fiction feedback: Review and improve

    Learn to diagnose and improve Short fiction feedback work with a focused rubric instead of vague judgment. You will separate symptoms from causes, revise the highest-value issue, and document the before-and-after difference.

    30 min Not complete

    Learning objectives

    • Evaluate a draft using explicit Short fiction feedback criteria.
    • Identify the cause behind the most important weakness.
    • Choose a revision with high impact and reasonable effort.
    • Explain how the revision changes the result.

    Key terms

    1

    Use the rubric, not a feeling

    Review the work for intentional choices, craft control, a coherent result, and thoughtful revision. Record evidence for each judgment so feedback points to something observable.

    2

    Diagnostic checklist

    Run this before you revise anything. Diagnosing first prevents the common failure of polishing the parts that were already fine.

    • Check: Treating C7 and C major seventh as the same chord — is this present in your work?
    • Check: Learning shapes without learning the notes — is this present in your work?
    • Check: Editing while generating — is this present in your work?
    • Check: Chasing a vague sense that it is not good enough — is this present in your work?
    3

    The quality bar

    This is what finished work looks like in this field. Use it as the standard for your revision rather than a general sense of improvement.

    • The work is finished to a shareable state, not left at draft
    • Choices are deliberate enough that you can explain two of them
    • A specific improvement has been identified for the next piece
    4

    Diagnose before editing

    Name the symptom, then ask what decision or missing step produced it. Choose the cause you can address rather than changing everything at once.

    5

    Revise and compare

    Make one purposeful revision and compare the two versions. Keep the change only if it improves the intended result without creating a larger problem.

    CHAPTER 4 OF 5 · REVIEW & IMPROVEShort fiction feedbackLeaves you with a finished draft with process notesCOURSE PROGRESSdraftrevisionbriefKEY TERMS
    Story lab

    Bend the tension curve of a story

    Move the climax and the stakes; the five-part shape shows what your structure promises the reader.

    The classic arc is a contract about attention: rising tension buys the reader's focus and the climax spends it. Late climaxes feel classic; early ones must earn their long ending.

    • Place the climax at 85% and describe what the short resolution demands.
    • Lower the stakes and watch what the flat curve does to the middle.
    Revision flowchart

    Evidence-led improvement loop

    Revise the cause of the highest-value issue, then compare the new result with the original criteria.

    Step 1 of 4: Inspect evidence
    Side-by-side comparison

    Two drafts of the same piece

    Use this pair as your revision rubric: find which column your current draft sits in, one row at a time.

    Aspect First-idea draft Developed draft
    Intent The mood drifts halfway through One clear intention carried start to finish
    Craft Every effect applied at once One technique controlled, in service of the brief
    Revision Restarted from scratch after vague dissatisfaction One named weakness fixed, with before and after kept

    The developed draft is not more talented — it is more decided.

    Practice round

    Rebuild the Short fiction feedback method

    The steps of this chapter's method, shuffled. Arrange them so they would actually work.

    A method is a sequence, not a bag of tips — if the order surprises you, that is exactly the gap worth closing now.

    • Order the steps, then explain to yourself why step 2 cannot go last.
    • Shuffle again and solve it in fewer moves.
    Practice activity - 16 min

    Run a focused revision cycle

    Review a previous Short fiction feedback artifact or the supplied flawed example, then improve the most consequential issue.

    1. Score the draft against three criteria.
    2. Quote or point to evidence for the weakest score.
    3. Name the likely cause and revise it.
    4. Write a before-and-after comparison.
    Deliverable

    A marked-up draft, revised version, and four-sentence change note.

    Success looks like
    • Feedback cites evidence.
    • The revision addresses a cause.
    • The comparison explains a measurable or observable improvement.
    Knowledge check

    Which feedback is most useful for improving Short fiction feedback?

    1 question
    Which feedback is most useful for improving Short fiction feedback?
    Not started

    Sign in to save chapter notes to your account.

    Ready to complete this chapter? Document one evidence-based diagnosis, revision, and before-and-after comparison.
  5. Chapter 5

    Creative routines: Capstone integration

    Integrate the course methods in a compact Creative routines capstone. You will define the brief, plan milestones, produce a complete result, gather tutor feedback, and leave with a repeatable next-practice plan.

    37 min Not complete

    Learning objectives

    • Translate the capstone brief into milestones and checks.
    • Combine the course methods without losing the central purpose.
    • Present evidence for the quality of the final result.
    • Choose the next skill to practice from the final review.

    Key terms

    1

    Define a finishable brief

    Choose a specific audience, result, and boundary for the Creative routines capstone. Reduce scope until the project can be finished and reviewed in one focused cycle.

    2

    Bringing the parts together

    A capstone is judged on coherence, not on the number of techniques it includes. Return to the core ideas and make sure the work demonstrates them rather than decorating them.

    • Triads are stacked thirds counted in semitones. A major triad is the root plus four semitones plus seven, so C major is C, E, G. A minor triad lowers only the middle note to three semitones, so C minor is C, E flat, G.
    • Sevenths are named by the interval above the root. A dominant seventh adds ten semitones above the root, making G7 into G, B, D, F, while a major seventh adds eleven, making G major seventh into G, B, D, F sharp. That single semitone is the difference between a chord that pulls to C and one that sits still.
    • Diatonic chords follow a fixed quality pattern. Every major key produces the same qualities in order: major, minor, minor, major, major, minor, diminished. In C that gives C, Dm, Em, F, G, Am and B diminished, which is why the I-V-vi-IV progression in C is C, G, Am, F.
    3

    Standards that make the work credible

    These are the marks of work that would be taken seriously by someone who does this professionally.

    • The work is finished to a shareable state, not left at draft
    • Choices are deliberate enough that you can explain two of them
    • A specific improvement has been identified for the next piece
    4

    Practitioner notes

    Small pieces of working knowledge that rarely appear in introductory material.

    • Practise the changes rather than the chords. The gap between two shapes is where the time is lost, so drill the transition alone against a metronome.
    • Learn the inversions of every triad early. Moving to the nearest inversion instead of the root position is most of what makes accompaniment sound smooth.
    5

    Build with checkpoints

    Plan foundation, first draft, verification, and revision milestones. At each checkpoint, save evidence instead of relying on memory.

    6

    Present and continue

    Present a finished draft with process notes with a concise rationale. Use the final rubric to choose one strength to retain and one next practice target.

    CHAPTER 5 OF 5 · CAPSTONECreative routinesLeaves you with a finished draft with process notesCOURSE PROGRESSrevisionbriefreferenceKEY TERMS
    Compounding lab

    Let 1% a day argue with a year

    Slide the daily change and the days; the curve shows what repetition quietly builds or erodes.

    The 1%-better curve is a metaphor with honest math inside: improvement compounds only when practice repeats, and decay compounds exactly as faithfully.

    • Compare +1% and −1% over a full year.
    • How many days before the curve visibly leaves the flat line?
    Visual model

    Capstone learning loop

    Capstone learning loop The capstone is a complete cycle: define a finishable brief, build, review evidence, then choose the next practice target. 1 Brief 2 Build 3 Review 4 Continue

    The capstone is a complete cycle: define a finishable brief, build, review evidence, then choose the next practice target.

    Practice round

    Match the Creative routines vocabulary

    Tap a term, then the definition it belongs to. Wrong guesses cost nothing but honesty.

    Retrieval beats rereading: pulling a definition from memory strengthens it far more than recognizing it on the page.

    • Clear the board once, shuffle, and beat your attempt count.
    • Say each definition aloud before tapping — then check yourself.
    Practice activity - 22 min

    Complete the capstone sprint

    Create a complete Creative routines artifact for a defined audience and purpose, using the course rubric to review it.

    1. Write a brief with scope and success criteria.
    2. Create the first complete version.
    3. Run a self-check and request focused tutor feedback.
    4. Revise, present, and set one next-practice target.
    Deliverable

    A finished capstone, evidence of one revision, and a next-practice note.

    Success looks like
    • The result answers the brief.
    • Course methods are visible.
    • Revision follows feedback or evidence.
    • The next step is specific and achievable.
    Knowledge check

    When is the Creative routines capstone ready to finish?

    1 question
    When is the Creative routines capstone ready to finish?
    Not started

    Sign in to save chapter notes to your account.

    Ready to complete this chapter? Submit the completed capstone, revision evidence, rubric review, and one concrete next-practice target.

Make it personal

Turn the public curriculum into your own learning path.

Ask Theo Laurent to adapt the sequence to your level, available time, and goal. The personalized path can then be saved in your workspace.